can somebody help me prove that cancer treatment has a long way to go?
as of now.. it seems like the only types of treatment available for people diagnosed with cancer involve surgeons cutting out portions of their body and/or blasting them with highly toxic, usually nonspecific radiation. what about differentiation therapy? how far along is it? does anybody else feel that cancer treatment has a lot room for improvement? don't get me wrong.. of course it works but there has to be better ways to deal with cancer right.. also i apologize if i didn't take other forms of treatment into consideration.. that's why i said "it seems like" at the beginning of that other sentence hah.. share some knowledge with me please!
Cancer - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I don’t think this is something difficult to prove as we still have far too many people die from the many diseases called cancer. Radiation in general is pretty specific and some types are very specific so I’m not sure what you mean by that. Surgery is the mainstay and the most effective way to treat cancer and I doubt a better way will come about very soon. There are other treatments such as chemo, hormone therapy and immunotherapy.
2 :
The medical industry would have you believe that the current therapies are working just fine, but the reality of all this is that only 2 to 3% of all cancer treatments show a survival rate of 5 years. This whole "survival rate" is a way to manipulate the statistics. Using RELATIVE numbers is another way instead of using the ABSOLUTE numbers. It's the only disease that data is being manipulated this way because it is simply NOT WORKING. The only two cancers that better data is showing is testicular cancer and Hogkin's disease that is approaching 40%, but those two cancers only account for 2% of the total. When you consider that medical researchers use the 30% cure rate as the basis for equaling a SUGAR PILL, it is very pathetic. So why after 100 years of researching this problem are we still looking at technologies that are failing miserably? The answer is quite simple when you follow the money. In order for a drug company to spend research dollars on something, they have to see a potential profit. Treating symptoms is very profitable. When you realize they can charge many dollars for a drug that costs them a few cents ( I mean penny's ) the profits are enormous. This is justified they say because of what the research has cost them. Really? Who's paying for this? Drug companies or billions of dollars being put into research by the public and government subsidies? In 1946, the FDA and two drug companies got together and convinced the Congress of the United States that the only treatments for cancer that would be acceptable were radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery. Everything else became illegal and people like Max Gerson that testified at that hearing showed he was getting a 50% cure rate. Cure at that time meant "Absence of Disease" as it is for all diseases. There was no 5 year survival rate. You will hear from medical people that cancer cannot be cured, only go in to remission. Really? Is that because they are desperately searching for answers that create huge profits or have they truly looked around the world and found people are actually being cured and that would be far too embarrassing to admit. When a patient gets a typical cancer treatment today, it is worth between $300,000 and $500,000 to the medical community. Now that is incentive to keep the statis quo I believe. It is a fact that I know of no doctor that would tell a person that if they get no treatment at all, they have a far better chance of surviving more than the 5 year survival rate. Many cancer doctors would not get chemotherapy or radiation if they got cancer or recommend their families get treated as well. The average person gets about 6 bouts of cancer assaults on them in their lifetime. The body's immune system is designed to eliminate cancer cells and does so every day. Assaults on the body's immune system is rampant. Did any doctor ever tell you that when you take an antibiotic that you are using the "B" cells of the humoral immunity to create this? Then did he tell you that you are putting your body at severe risk regarding viruses and cancer? You see the "B" cells and "T" cells are reciprocal. That means that when you turn on the "B" cells to create antibodies, you turn OFF the "T" cells that gets rid of cancer cells and viruses. So you have now left your immune system weak in that regard. The body is very capable of fighting many diseases and does NOT need the vaccination technology that is being promoted to do so if you have a strong immunity. So why aren't doctors focused on building that strong immunity instead of injecting poisons into people that are supposed to stimulate the immune system to do what? Be strong? "Room for improvement?" I would say room for a complete overhaul and re-thinking what we are dealing with. Greed and avarice to start with. Then let's allow alternative treatments to be used that are showing successes. That would be a wonderful start, but the power of big money is quite impressive. MONEY DOESN'T TALK, IT SCREAMS. To express the total absurdity of what is happening, just imagine how many people would buy a car that only 2 to 3% of them worked for more than 5 years? And how long would people stand by not saying anything if the government said it was the only kind of car you could buy and no one would be allowed to innovate other ways of building the car? Using fear, marketing hype, the idea of "scientific research" is so wonderful, and manipulation of the data has created this what I call "DRUG FRAUD." Yes there are other ways to approach cancer, but NOT IN AMERICA today. It is not legal. good luck to you
3 :
It's good to see someone questioning the idea that poisoning your body to promote healing is "curing" anything. If the medical profession and drug companies are "searching for a cure" and fund raising to that end, wouldn't that confirm to any thinking person, that what they are doing now in the way of treatment they know doesn't work. Searching for a cure for the last 30 or so years means THEY DON'T HAVE ONE!!! People recover in spite of the treatment, it's smoke and mirrors, faith with a capital T. Faith in the white coat, the degrees and at what cost. Your healing and health placed in jeopardy. Cancer comes from an imbalanced lifestyle, diet, your environment, loss of sleep, lack of exercise, trauma and stress, and excesses such as smoking and alcohol . The damaged cells go wild, and ones immune system contains them, forming a tumour. The problem then starts when a biopsy is taken and this spreads the toxins. Let's all get back to basics, and don't rush into treatment. It takes years to get to the point of the disease. If you are diagnosed, step back a while, get the facts, do some hard thinking before you are rushed into anything. Be in control of your body and your health.
Read more discussions :
Title : can somebody help me prove that cancer treatment has a long way to go
Description : can somebody help me prove that cancer treatment has a long way to go? as of now.. it seems like the only types of treatment available fo...